The Fatal Flaw in Anti-Vaping Research

Anti-Vaping research often uses Machines to simulate the act of Vaping or Smoking: this is a fatal flaw in how Vaping is studied – rendering most anti-Vaping Research meaningless. Unlike Cigarettes, Vapor Devices depend on user feedback to avoid ‘Dry hits’, or puffs taken with insufficient e-liquid, where the wicking material is burned. Vapers inherently avoid dry hits because of the horrible taste of the vapor, but machines cannot differentiate. This research proves that dry hits are likely responsible for the detection of Harmful or Potentially Harmful Compounds in Vapor, proving that research claiming vaping is dangerous, is most likely the result of a flawed experiment that does not have relevance in the real world.

Leave a Comment